The recent French riots in the streets of Paris suburbs and other parts have awakened the world, that even unemployment can be a cause for concern among the population. First, not burning cars and stores the French government realized that there might be the issue of employment crisis with a developed country. Thanks to the media for its efforts to disseminate information. French is always ahead for this revolt and revolution is the revolution that made Government to rethink its policies. And 'beginning!
There is no ethnic division of the country, but has less effect on culture. The people here are more modern and understanding to ethnic or racial crisis is negligible. People believe that their weekend in costs, rather than going to church. Most churches are empty on Sundays, but recently some Muslim communities have started their actual presence. Almost 10% of the population is Muslim from Africa or elsewhere, and 10% are Chinese, East Europe, Sri Lanka and other Asian countries. Together constitute 20% of the total population of the country. 90% of them repaired in urban areas and 70% are living in poverty.
Therefore, we should not blame racism for only the riot rather the blame should go to inequality due to wide gap between rich and poor. serious crisis between these communities is the lack of adequate opportunity to upgrade their standard of living. Must settle for limited choices. Governments have never tried to raise their standard of living. Employment problems are due to ineligibility for better opportunities. Have not yet improved enough to enter into economic growth and the French government has also started to promote.
including the working class white population is unhappy because there is a wide gap between demand and supply of employment opportunities. Because the provision of high employment, a decline in demand, most of them work for minimum wage. Unions can not fight for the minimum wage, but the issue is different. The main problem is the lack of labor demand to determine a value of jobs. Automation has reduced the scope of employment opportunities. I visited a liquor industry in Normandy and found two people running the show, even self-service in many areas have contributed to reduced employment opportunities. Therefore, the government must review the situation and more open areas and fields of employment opportunities.
Five% of the total working population in agriculture and 25% in industry, indicates the educational system is related to the field of urban services that consume nearly 70% of the workforce. greater share of agricultural employment and rural industry is taken care of by automatic unit. excessive use of automation is curse until people sit without jobs.
The country is in the socialist model, but the protection of the governments' is for large groups. Therefore, super giants such as Carrefour, Leclerc, Auchan, etc. monopolize the market to squeeze out small farmers and producers to make high margin. Competition minimizes the workforce. Large groups always get bigger, the other working class is poorer. living expenses are too high and need to maintain sufficient income to meet minimum requirements. required of entrepreneurs of small '35 hours is a black spot right on the economy. My appeal to this is the claim is unfounded, when the population is involved in key services sectors and industries also operated by less manpower. Governments must consider the equal distribution of opportunities and resources to meet the needs of the population. Excessive automation is unfit for any country as long as the population has no job.
excessive burden for business owners to contribute to social security, minimum wages medical insurance, etc. causing them to retain fewer workers and seek work increasingly from them. A good employer pays indirectly, almost double the employee. With the same amount entrepreneur could keep two people. Reducing the rate and increase the retirement age, would facilitate the farmer. Typically, when the employee reaches the age of 50 years considered ineffective, at least this is the practice in many industrial productions. Early retirement is not a solution to improve employment opportunities, rather than this increase only the number of unemployed in the country. pensioner eventually become burden to the government.
Very soon, the French government is to address this situation, the retirement age up to 68-70 increased to a minimum. Nearly 10 million of the total population is over 65 and pensioners are unemployed, this number for further developments between the age group 20-64 are almost 35 million euros which means more than half of the population. Indirectly, 35 million between the age group 20-64 have the burden of the remaining population. Should pay more taxes to maintain the standard of rest. If the retirement age, they too have their contribution to the economy. social security measures for the unemployed are good until the completion of minimum working hours set at 27,000 or 15 years as before.
Mechanization is unwanted in many areas, only allow to minimize the opportunities for employment. services sectors and sources of small size may be the best choice to promote employment opportunities among less educated or non-technical class. Required minimum contributions for employees account discouraging employers. Increasing the minimum number of years of service automatically reduces the burden on employers. many industries recently moved from France to other countries. high production costs on high taxes and labor costs have forced them to move their set-up. May be included on incentive based.
Illegal immigration is a serious problem in this country. They, as a model democratic country, human rights and living standards that may be less in their county. For them, France is heaven to take the risk of entering the country deserves. However, the government becomes a hell of problems to manage. They need to do to reduce these problems by introducing necessary rules.
France, Germany and other European countries face hidden economic crisis, is treated differently to overcome. They have to minimize the cost of excessive government, reduce corruption, and minimize dependence on processing, storage and sale of weapons and other expenses saved used as an aid to generate jobs. Despite all the pressures from the EU or WTO agencies, we must introduce the contribution of certain sectors of the economy inviting work-related. The grants, in addition to bringing more jobs to the country would also bring competitiveness in the global market. Grants may only invite entrepreneurs to bring their set back to the village. More people in the occupied country than the generation of direct and indirect government.
No comments:
Post a Comment